When AI Eats the Grid: Why Artificial Intelligence Will Outconsume Bitcoin by 2026

I’m not going to lie to you or sugar-coat this: when ChatGPT first came out I was absolutely one of the first to use it. It could generate silly cartoon-like images (nothing realistic like it does now), and it would glitch more often than not. I still found it fascinating though, and spent the first two years experimenting with what it could do. I wasn’t one of the anti-AI people who claimed it was coming for all our jobs (I think people said the same thing about the internet or automations, and it never happened), and I’ll be the first to share what it’s good at and what it isn’t.

It started with data that turned into intelligence, now it’s devouring electricity faster than we can track, and what comes next could rewrite our relationship with power, sustainability, and the very limits of the grid.

Somewhere out there today (maybe miles underground or across a desert plain) a server farm is thinking, just calculating whatever it is we asked it to. Line after line of code, model after model as our AI agents evolve, there are neural networks whispering to one another in heat and light.

While we ask chatbots for dinner plans, to find cool bodybuilder gyms for our husbands, or swipe through AI-generated portraits of ourselves as medieval queens (totally did that), something massive is stirring beneath it all. AI is consuming electricity at a rate the planet didn’t prepare for. By the end of 2026, it’s most likely going to surpass even Bitcoin, the poster child of unsustainable tech.

We built a mind, and now we must feed it.

A New Kind of Hunger

Brains have always been hungry things. Although it makes up only about 2% of your body weight, your brain consumes around 20–25% of your total energy intake (I’m assuming you’re an adult), even at rest according to Live Science. It’s really not shocking to me that AI was going to be just as ravenous.

In the early days of artificial intelligence, models were manageable as they were much smaller, localized and purely academic. That age has come and gone, however. Today’s models (like GPT-4, Gemini, Claude, Grok, and their successors) aren’t just smart, they’re massive. Billion-parameter beasts trained on data scraped from every digital corner of humanity.

They don’t live on your phone or in your laptop either, they live in data centers. I mean, like thousands of them, all around the world, each filled with rows of GPUs spinning, heating, whirring…consuming energy like a growing city. To train one model like GPT-4, researchers estimate it required over 25,000 megawatt-hours of electricity, which is enough to power a small town for a year.

Oh yeah, did I mention that’s just the training phase? Once deployed, each AI prompt, each chat reply, each video generation is an "inference", and every inference draws energy…billions of times per day. The result is staggering:
By 2026, AI could surpass Bitcoin’s total energy use, according to recent estimates from think tanks and energy analysts. And Bitcoin, as Cointelegraph reports, uses roughly around 120–176 TWh per year depending on the estimate and methodology. AllaboutAI claims that AI could be using around ~170 TWh currently at the start of 2026 and 17B Gallons of Water.

Honestly, Bitcoin taught us how dangerous digital power can be. Its proof-of-work system turned mining into a race for computational dominance globally. Warehouses of ASIC miners lit up the world’s grid to solve abstract math puzzles for coins, not to store data or to serve people.

It was criticized, rightfully so, as an environmental nightmare, but at least it was predictable. AI is not predictable in that same way, instead it’s exponential. Where Bitcoin’s energy use was tied to incentives and capped by mining difficulty, AI’s energy use grows with every improvement and every new use case, every business racing to automate a human task feeds it.

Unlike Bitcoin, AI is everywhere: hospitals, classrooms, police stations, movie studios, farms, banks, militaries, the list goes on and on and it might be shorter to figure out where it’s not used than where it is at this point.

We didn't ask if we should, we asked how fast we could, and the machines listened.

Why AI Is So Energy-Intensive

First, there’s the training that goes into large models, which means feeding them billions of lines of text, images, audio, and video, and forcing them to learn patterns. This is done across hundreds or thousands of high-end GPUs for days or weeks. A single training cycle for a frontier model can emit as much CO₂ as five cars will in their lifetimes.

After training, the real energy burn begins. Cue Disco Inferno music. Every user interaction triggers an inference: a flash of computation to generate a response. Multiply that by billions of daily users, and inference can use even more power than training.

AI systems run in hyperscale data centers. These facilities require industrial cooling systems (unless they’re being stored in cool regions like Finland), battery backups and diesel generators, constant HVAC and server maintenance, and a grid connection capable of feeding entire neighborhoods.

Cooling alone can account for 40–50% of a data center’s total energy use.

Bitcoin miners often reduce power use during grid congestion to avoid penalties. AI, however, is user-facing, it runs all day, all night, across time zones, with absolutely no downtime.

The machine never sleeps, and so the grid never rests.

The Numbers Are Climbing…Fast

Energy researchers, including the International Energy Agency (IEA), now warn that AI-driven data center demand is accelerating faster than any kind of grid planning anticipated. Current projections suggest that by the mid-to-late 2020s global data center electricity demand could double, with AI workloads responsible for a rapidly growing share. AI alone might just approach ~1–2% of global electricity consumption, depending on adoption speed and efficiency gains. Localized grid strain is already emerging as large AI clusters come online faster than transmission and generation upgrades can keep pace

This doesn’t mean AI has already overtaken Bitcoin or nation-states, but it does mean it’s on a trajectory to rival them, and unlike Bitcoin, its growth curve is less predictable and more tightly coupled to everyday services.

The pressure is already visible around the world. Ireland, where data centers account for a significant share of national electricity use, has restricted new developments around Dublin due to grid limits. The United States, particularly the Southwest and parts of the Midwest, is seeing rapid AI data-center expansion from Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, and Google, facilities that can draw as much power as small cities, because it’s comparatively cheap for now, not because energy is abundant here. China continues to build centralized AI infrastructure, increasing regional load even as it races to expand generation capacity.

The issue isn’t that the grid is failing today, it’s that it was never designed for machines that run continuously, globally, and at this sort of exponential scale.

Most people still think of AI as a software layer, but it’s not; it’s a hardware revolution in disguise. For each and every prompt you type, there’s an energy chain: mining for lithium and copper, shipping components globally, manufacturing chips in Taiwan, running servers in Nevada, cooling them with water in Utah, then emitting carbon from natural gas in Texas.

The illusion of digital minimalism hides a very physical, very extractive reality.

Tech companies absolutely love to promise carbon neutrality, but neutrality, in many cases, means purchasing offsets or future sustainability pledges…not reducing present-day energy use. It’s the equivalent of taking out a climate mortgage and hoping tomorrow’s tech will pay it off.

What Happens When the Grid Says No?

Already, some energy companies are sounding the alarm.

Texas has warned of data center-driven blackouts during peak summer hours, Sweden and Finland are limiting new server farm permits, and South Korea is fast-tracking AI-specific taxes to offset energy impact. In a world of accelerating climate change and already-fragile power grids, the question becomes chillingly real: what happens when AI use grows faster than power infrastructure can handle?

Do we ration compute, limit access by price, or do we keep building, and burn whatever we have to to keep the machine online?

This is next year’s policy meeting boiled down to its finest.

We’re currently devoting staggering amounts of energy to non-human cognition…to machines that don’t eat, sleep, or love, but simply calculate. We’re also doing it while hundreds of millions still lack access to reliable electricity, climate migration accelerates across the global south, and entire regions face rolling blackouts and heat-related death.

To me, this is the literal paradox of progress. People claim AI will help us solve global problems, but first, it consumes the very resources we need to survive them.

How much electricity should a chatbot deserve and how many megawatts should go toward poetry-generating neural nets while cities run out of water?

Regulation isn’t coming fast enough. The U.S. has begun asking questions, but its regulatory framework is slow and outdated. Europe’s AI Act focuses on ethics and transparency…not energy. China is focused on control, not conservation.

There are no global standards for energy disclosures for AI models, limits on inference draw, carbon taxation per compute hour, or mandatory renewable sourcing for data centers. Without standards, the market will optimize for profit, not sustainability, and AI is a market like no other. It grows because it can, not because it should.

You don’t need to throw your laptop in the sea or go on the interwebs and rage-bait everyone who generated an image with AI. Trust me, I can’t tell you how many people messaged me about an article I wrote about insect populations dying because I had used an AI generated image on LinkedIn. Moral warriors who didn’t even read the story, but took the time out of their day to tell me it was my fault the insects were dying.

You can stay aware though. Choose tools that disclose their energy use or support legislation for green data infrastructure. Push companies to be transparent about AI sourcing and learn about the systems behind the screen.

Behind every “Generate” button is a turbine, and behind every output is an input you might never see.

Want to Learn the System from the Ground Up?

If this made you wonder what’s under the hood of AI…maybe it’s time to get curious on your own terms. Start small, tinker, and learn what makes machines tick.
Raspberry Pi 4 Starter Kit! Perfect for hobbyists, students, or anyone who wants to understand the basics of hardware and computation, without burning through megawatts.

If you’re in need of “free” electricity, here is a solar charger you can use! Sometimes the best way to understand the big machine…is to build a small one.

When AI Eats the Grid: Why Artificial Intelligence Will Outconsume Bitcoin by 2026

A New Kind of Hunger

Why AI Is So Energy-Intensive

The Numbers Are Climbing…Fast

What Happens When the Grid Says No?

Want to Learn the System from the Ground Up?

Related Reads You Might’ve Missed:

AI Outscores Humans in Emotional Intelligence: What Now?

The Virus Archive: How AI Just Uncovered 70,000 New Microbial Mysteries